Ahoy,
sldb-highlight-sexp is currently broken in Emacs because paren-mode is XEmacs specific. Does somebody care about sldb-sexp-highlight-mode? Otherwise I'm going to delete it and restore the old code.
Helmut.
sldb-highlight-sexp is currently broken in Emacs because paren-mode is XEmacs specific. Does somebody care about sldb-sexp-highlight-mode? Otherwise I'm going to delete it and restore the old code.
it's just been added by me. (it's not xemacs dependent but paredit dependent that i didn't notice due to my shared init.el file).
please apply the attached patch:
2006-11-03 Attila Lendvai attila.lendvai@gmail.com
* slime.el (slime-repl-kill-input): Also reset the history navigation and when point is right after the prompt then delete the entire repl input. (slime-repl-delete-from-input-history): New. Deletes the current repl input from the history when navigating the history. Bound to "\M-\C-d". Unfortunately slime-repl-merge-histories currently loads them back when the history is saved. (sldb-sexp-highlight-mode): Handle case when paredit is not loaded.
hth,
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:21:30 +0100 From: "Attila Lendvai" attila.lendvai@gmail.com
sldb-highlight-sexp is currently broken in Emacs because paren-mode is XEmacs specific. Does somebody care about sldb-sexp-highlight-mode? Otherwise I'm going to delete it and restore the old code.
it's just been added by me. (it's not xemacs dependent but paredit dependent that i didn't notice due to my shared init.el file).
Just to clarify, paredit has nothing to do with `paren-mode', the latter of which I know nothing about (an XEmacsism?). I don't think any of the patches involved actually mistakenly do anything with paredit, but the commentary is slightly confused/confusing.
it's just been added by me. (it's not xemacs dependent but paredit dependent that i didn't notice due to my shared init.el file).
Just to clarify, paredit has nothing to do with `paren-mode', the latter of which I know nothing about (an XEmacsism?). I don't think any of the patches involved actually mistakenly do anything with paredit, but the commentary is slightly confused/confusing.
fair enough, it was only a wild and quick guess based on a sloppy test against gnu emacs.
it's xemacs only and you can set it to 'sexp-surround to color the entire sexp the caret is in. the patch mimics this in sldb in default mode when marking a stackframe in the source.
sorry for the confusion,