[slime-devel] Hide REPL
Hi, I am using Slime/Emacs on Windows. I have a dual monitor setup. So I create a new frame, move that to the second monitor, and set that to the Slime REPL buffer. Now in my main monitor, I have the code visible. When I run a function in the main window, the window is split in half with code and REPL showing. I want to stop this behavior of automatically splitting the window. The REPL on the other frame updates, so that's not a problem. So when I run a function (C-M-x), I don't want the window to split. Can anyone please help me with this? Thanks
On Dec 24, 2008, at 07:33 , kogu wrote:
Now in my main monitor, I have the code visible. When I run a function in the main window, the window is split in half with code and REPL showing.
I want to stop this behavior of automatically splitting the window. The REPL on the other frame updates, so that's not a problem. So when I run a function (C-M-x), I don't want the window to split. Can anyone please help me with this?
I do that with `special-display-regexps': M-x customize-variable RET special-display-regexps RET Parameter: same-frame Value: t -- Cheers, Michael
* kogu [2008-12-24 07:33+0100] writes:
Hi,
I am using Slime/Emacs on Windows.
I have a dual monitor setup. So I create a new frame, move that to the second monitor, and set that to the Slime REPL buffer.
Now in my main monitor, I have the code visible. When I run a function in the main window, the window is split in half with code and REPL showing.
I want to stop this behavior of automatically splitting the window. The REPL on the other frame updates, so that's not a problem. So when I run a function (C-M-x), I don't want the window to split. Can anyone please help me with this?
We use display-buffer in this case and there are a some variables to customize display-buffer (at least in Emacs 23). E.g. display-buffer-reuse-frames or display-buffer-function. Soon, I will move the REPL code to contrib. That will probably change some of these issues. Helmut.
* kogu <loom.20081224T063259-249@post.gmane.org> : Wrote on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:33:17 +0000 (UTC): | I have a dual monitor setup. So I create a new frame, move that to the | second monitor, and set that to the Slime REPL buffer. | | Now in my main monitor, I have the code visible. When I run a function | in the main window, the window is split in half with code and REPL | showing. | | I want to stop this behavior of automatically splitting the | window. The REPL on the other frame updates, so that's not a | problem. So when I run a function (C-M-x), I don't want the window to | split. Can anyone please help me with this? In one setup, I set up pop-up-windows to nil, and even advice pop-to-buffer to call switch-to-buffer instead. In this scenario, a recent change to slime causes problems by insisting that slime display repl output in a certain way. I had asked about this earlier here on this list -- Subject: Eliminating annoying pop-ups Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:20:57 +0530 Message-ID: <m34p2n0wla.fsf@moon.robolove.meer.net> FWIW I work around it with the appended patch to slime.el. (Although I do not recommend this approach) -- Madhu eliminate popping up the repl buffer during interactive eval. * (slime-eval-with-transcript-no-popups): New variable. Set this to avoid popups. diff --git a/slime.el b/slime.el index fc4e56c..649c90f 100644 --- a/slime.el +++ b/slime.el @@ -5442,10 +5442,13 @@ inserted in the current buffer." (destructuring-bind (output value) result (insert output value))))))) +(defvar slime-eval-with-transcript-no-popups t) ;madhu 081111 + (defun slime-eval-with-transcript (form &optional msg no-popups cont) "Eval FROM in Lisp. Display output, if any, caused by the evaluation." (when msg (slime-insert-transcript-delimiter msg)) - (setq slime-repl-popup-on-output (not no-popups)) + ;;(setq slime-repl-popup-on-output (not no-popups)) + (setq slime-repl-popup-on-output (not slime-eval-with-transcript-no-popups)) (setq cont (or cont #'slime-display-eval-result)) (slime-rex (cont (buffer (current-buffer))) (form) ((:ok value) (slime-eval-with-transcript-cont t value cont
participants (4)
-
Helmut Eller -
kogu -
Madhu -
Michael Weber