Index: slime/ChangeLog diff -u slime/ChangeLog:1.794 slime/ChangeLog:1.795 --- slime/ChangeLog:1.794 Tue Oct 11 23:11:24 2005 +++ slime/ChangeLog Fri Oct 14 20:51:01 2005 @@ -1,3 +1,22 @@ +2005-10-15 Douglas Crosher dcrosher@common-lisp.net + + * swank-scl.lisp: Support for Scieneer Common Lisp. + + * swank-backend.lisp (*gray-stream-symbols*) Scieneer Common Lisp + implements stream-line-length. + + * swank-loader.lisp: Support for Scieneer Common Lisp: + (*sysdep-pathnames*) use swank-scl. + (*impl ementation-features*) add :scl. + (*os-features*) add :hpux. + (*architecture-features*) add :amd64, :i686, :i486, :sparc64, :sparc, + :hppa64, and :hppa. + + * swank.lisp: (*canonical-package-nicknames*) use lowercase + symbols to name the packages. This supports CL implementations + with lowercase default symbol names, such as Scieneer Common Lisp, + while still being compatible with ANSI-CL. + 2005-10-11 Stefan Kamphausen skampi@gmx.net
* slime.el: Persistent REPL history. The history from REPL
All,
- swank.lisp: (*canonical-package-nicknames*) use lowercase
- symbols to name the packages. This supports CL implementations
- with lowercase default symbol names, such as Scieneer Common Lisp,
- while still being compatible with ANSI-CL.
Is there a way that Scieneer Common Lisp can be supported without forcing lowercase package names on the other implementations?
It just doesn't feel right to see
:cl-user>
instead of
CL-USER>
Glenn Ehrlich
Glenn Ehrlich glenn.ehrlich@specastro.com writes:
Is there a way that Scieneer Common Lisp can be supported without forcing lowercase package names on the other implementations?
It just doesn't feel right to see
:cl-user>
instead of
CL-USER>
I second that, because uppercase package names seem to stand out more for me. But this is just a minor annoyance.
Paolo
Glenn Ehrlich wrote: ...
- swank.lisp: (*canonical-package-nicknames*) use lowercase
- symbols to name the packages. This supports CL implementations
- with lowercase default symbol names, such as Scieneer Common Lisp,
- while still being compatible with ANSI-CL.
...
Is there a way that Scieneer Common Lisp can be supported without forcing lowercase package names on the other implementations?
Yes, the change in the printed name has been reverted and the package name will now again be printed at the prompt as uppercase if appropriate.
Regards Douglas Crosher
Douglas Crosher <dtc <at> scieneer.com> writes:
Yes, the change in the printed name has been reverted and the package name will now again be printed at the prompt as uppercase if appropriate.
Regards Douglas Crosher
Thank you for taking care of this.
Glenn
-
Douglas Crosher -
Glenn Ehrlich -
lgorrie＠common-lisp.net -
Paolo Amoroso