Hello,
I've made the attached patch to address the issues I brought up in the earlier topic. However, now the results of REPL interactions are sent back twice: once as :write-string (one per value), and the other as an :ok for a :return in response to :emacs-rex. Something tells me that :write-string is a sort of bad idea and things should be done more declaratively (values in the :return can be annotated with their presentation ids and the actual buffer writing could be done in slime.el?), but that's a big change and besides I don't have write access to the slime cvs anymore. If whoever is responsible can ask the c-l.net admin to give me the necessary permissions, I can take a shot at it over the weekend.
Thanks, Vladimir
Oops, here is a patch to my original patch to fix reader errors.
Vladimir
On 6/7/07, Vladimir Sedach vsedach@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've made the attached patch to address the issues I brought up in the earlier topic. However, now the results of REPL interactions are sent back twice: once as :write-string (one per value), and the other as an :ok for a :return in response to :emacs-rex. Something tells me that :write-string is a sort of bad idea and things should be done more declaratively (values in the :return can be annotated with their presentation ids and the actual buffer writing could be done in slime.el?), but that's a big change and besides I don't have write access to the slime cvs anymore. If whoever is responsible can ask the c-l.net admin to give me the necessary permissions, I can take a shot at it over the weekend.
Thanks, Vladimir
-
Vladimir Sedach