[slime-devel] removing overlays from the beginning of a buffer
If a source buffer starts with an annotated form then slime-remove-notes won't find it. Easily fixed (but there may be a better way - I'm not that familiar with the source). - nick (defun slime-remove-old-overlays () "Delete the existing Slime overlays in the current buffer." (dolist (buffer (slime-filter-buffers (lambda () slime-mode))) (with-current-buffer buffer (save-excursion (save-restriction (widen) ; remove overlays within the whole buffer. (goto-char (point-min)) (let ((o)) (when (setq o (slime-note-at-point)) (delete-overlay o)) (while (setq o (slime-find-next-note)) (delete-overlay o))))))))
Stas Boukarev <stassats <at> gmail.com> writes:
If a source buffer starts with an annotated form then slime-remove-notes won't find it. Easily fixed (but there may be a better way - I'm not that familiar with the source).
Committed, thanks.
The committed revision introduces a bug; Revision 1.1216 of slime.el makes the following change to the first line of `slime-remove-old-overlays': - (dolist (buffer (slime-filter-buffers (lambda () slime-mode))) + (dolist (buffer (slime-filter-buffers 'slime-mode)) This has the effect of toggling slime-mode off every time the user compiles a file (among other things). The old version was checking the value of the variable `slime-mode' in every buffer, whereas the new version calls the function `slime-mode' in every buffer, which is almost certainly not what you want. Lisp-2 strikes again! ;) James
James Wright <james@chumsley.org> writes:
Stas Boukarev <stassats <at> gmail.com> writes:
If a source buffer starts with an annotated form then slime-remove-notes won't find it. Easily fixed (but there may be a better way - I'm not that familiar with the source).
Committed, thanks.
The committed revision introduces a bug; Revision 1.1216 of slime.el makes the following change to the first line of `slime-remove-old-overlays':
- (dolist (buffer (slime-filter-buffers (lambda () slime-mode))) + (dolist (buffer (slime-filter-buffers 'slime-mode))
This has the effect of toggling slime-mode off every time the user compiles a file (among other things). The old version was checking the value of the variable `slime-mode' in every buffer, whereas the new version calls the function `slime-mode' in every buffer, which is almost certainly not what you want. Lisp-2 strikes again! ;)
Oh, sorry. What was I thinking. -- With best regards, Stas.
participants (3)
-
James Wright -
Nick Levine -
Stas Boukarev