small-cl-src-discuss May 2004

small-cl-src-discuss@common-lisp.net

6 participants
3 discussions

[Small-cl-src-discuss] Re: Funcallable macros
by Lars Brinkhoff 28 May '04

28 May '04

Lars Brinkhoff <lars(a)nocrew.org> writes: > (compile nil `(lambda ,args ,(macroexpand `(,name ,@args)))))) Slightly embarassed, I now recall that the compiler has a very useful feature: it expands macros automatically. Replace the line above with (compile nil `(lambda ,args (,name ,@args))))) -- Lars Brinkhoff, Services for Unix, Linux, GCC, HTTP Brinkhoff Consulting http://www.brinkhoff.se/

1 0

[Small-cl-src-discuss] licenses?
by Robert P. Goldman 28 May '04

28 May '04

I've been reading the code snippets with great interest and appreciation. But I've been a little nervous about using any of them, for fear of raging attack lawyers. :-> More seriously, I don't want to abuse anyone's confidence by adopting code they were just sharing for pedagogical purposes. So, I was wondering, would people mind letting us know what sort of licenses they are putting on these code snippets? Or is there some standard license implied by posting to small-cl-src? Thanks, R

5 5

[Small-cl-src-discuss] Re: apply in terms of funcall
by Lars Brinkhoff 18 May '04

18 May '04

Andreas Fuchs <asf(a)boinkor.net> writes: > (apply-definer call-arguments-limit) Should be (define-apply call-arguments-limit) -- Lars Brinkhoff, Services for Unix, Linux, GCC, HTTP Brinkhoff Consulting http://www.brinkhoff.se/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

small-cl-src-discuss May 2004