hi!
just wanted to take a look at snmp1 and seems like mib.lisp is not checked in the CVS.
another question is about the license: is there a strong confidence behind the license choice or is it just a random pick? GPL renders any code useless in the project i would like to use it in, and i wonder if there's any uncertanity in the choice...
thanks for your time,
Attila Lendvai writes:
just wanted to take a look at snmp1 and seems like mib.lisp is not checked in the CVS.
Hm, I don't think there should be such a file. There should be a "mib" directory with a few files (defs.lisp, ...) under it.
another question is about the license: is there a strong confidence behind the license choice or is it just a random pick? GPL renders any code useless in the project i would like to use it in, and i wonder if there's any uncertanity in the choice...
No, this is a conscious decision. I'm sorry to hear that you cannot use the code under these conditions.
With kind regards,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:58:57PM +0100, Simon Leinen wrote:
Attila Lendvai writes:
just wanted to take a look at snmp1 and seems like mib.lisp is not checked in the CVS.
Hm, I don't think there should be such a file. There should be a "mib" directory with a few files (defs.lisp, ...) under it.
another question is about the license: is there a strong confidence behind the license choice or is it just a random pick? GPL renders any code useless in the project i would like to use it in, and i wonder if there's any uncertanity in the choice...
No, this is a conscious decision. I'm sorry to hear that you cannot use the code under these conditions.
The mib.lisp should be there now.
And I have decided to change the license to something more cl-friendly. What do you suggest?
Beware that the code is quite immature. I just find a bug in the function that reads the enums from the mibs.
The mib.lisp should be there now.
thanks!
And I have decided to change the license to something more cl-friendly. What do you suggest?
well, our libs (like stefil, computed-class, defclass-star, cl-rdbms) are BSD / public domain. public domain is not accepted in all countries, therefore the dual license, but i'm far from being a license expert.
Beware that the code is quite immature. I just find a bug in the function that reads the enums from the mibs.
(un)fortunately our project seems to be delayed... :|
thanks again,
I have decided to use LLGPL, hope to make the necessary changes to the file real soon now.
By the way, your SYSMAN package has no license, making it unchangable and undistributable. That was one of the reasons I wrote this package. Tried to mail you about the problem some time ago.
-
Attila Lendvai -
Johan Ur Riise -
Simon Leinen