tbnl-announce November 2006

tbnl-announce@common-lisp.net

1 participants
5 discussions

[hunchentoot-announce] New release 0.4.10 (Was: *http-error-handler* behaviour)
by Edi Weitz 19 Nov '06

19 Nov '06

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:55 +0100, "Marijn Haverbeke" <marijnh(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Attached is the patch, I went with the name *handle-http-errors-p* > instead. Thanks a lot - it's in the latest release. Cheers, Edi.

1 0

[hunchentoot-announce] New release 0.4.9 (Was: header(s)-out)
by Edi Weitz 12 Nov '06

12 Nov '06

On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:55:58 -0700, "Robert J. Macomber" <tbnl(a)rojoma.com> wrote: > There seems to be some small bugs involving header-out. The > accessor is documented to take both keywords and strings, but > neither works reliably because: > > [snip] Yes, you're absolutely right. Thanks for spotting that. As I said, there were obviously too many (untested) changes at once when I switched from TBNL to Hunchentoot. > Here's a patch which normalizes things so the keys of this alist are > always strings and the lookup is always done with strings. I've changed this a little bit because I prefer that the keys are strings. Thanks, Edi.

1 0

[hunchentoot-announce] New version 0.4.8 (Was: Problems with file uploads and mod_lisp)
by Edi Weitz 06 Nov '06

06 Nov '06

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:07:26 +0100, Edi Weitz <edi(a)agharta.de> wrote: > I just realized that Hunchentoot in its current form has problems > with file uploads if it's used behind mod_lisp. I think I've fixed this in 0.4.8 now. At least I found something in START-OUTPUT which was obviously wrong and a result of my porting and re-factoring Hunchentoot/TBNL too hastily. Cheers, Edi.

1 0

[hunchentoot-announce] New version 0.4.7 (Was: real-remote-addr and proxy chains)
by Edi Weitz 05 Nov '06

05 Nov '06

On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:18:50 -0700, "Robert J. Macomber" <tbnl(a)rojoma.com> wrote: > Depends on whether you're interested in the user's (claimed) real > address, or the address the user presents to the web server to which > he thinks he's speaking. In my case, I'm interested in the latter > (that is, I'm just interested in what REMOTE-ADDR would be if > Hunchentoot weren't behind a server-side proxy). Having looked at > the documentation for sessions in the past five minutes, I see that > that machinery is interested in the former. OK, I've implemented the version I described in my previous email. The new release also fixes the bug in COOKIE-OUT you mentioned. Thanks, Edi.

1 0

[hunchentoot-announce] New version 0.4.6 (Was: Confusing Hunchentoot behaviour)
by Edi Weitz 05 Nov '06

05 Nov '06

On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 21:48:24 +0100, "Marijn Haverbeke" <marijnh(a)gmail.com> wrote: > A good fix would be to just call *meta-dispatcher* for every call to > dispatch-request, so that you've always got the most recent > dispatch-table and the programmer can fiddle with that variable from > the REPL and immediately see the result. I've implemented that now in the new version. *META-DISPATCHER* came in pretty late in the game, and it wasn't intended to behave like it did until 0.4.5. Thanks for the report. Cheers, Edi.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

tbnl-announce November 2006