On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:47:56 -0700, Cyrus Harmon <ch-tbnl(a)bobobeach.com> wrote:
> Should these two notions be more "decoupled" or should I just think
> host:port when I see host?
I think it makes sense to allow for a separate PORT parameter. You
can still provide "foo.com:4242" as the HOST argument, if you want.
It's in the new release.
Thanks,
Edi.