Hi Bob and list!
On 2005-08-17 07:52:57, Bob Hutchison wrote:
On Aug 17, 2005, at 3:39 AM, Stefan Scholl wrote:
Forget it. mod_lisp is much, much faster. 3 to 4 times faster in a local test with ApacheBench against Apache 1.3 + mod_lisp + TBNL, lighttpd + mod_proxy + TBNL, and TBNL stand-alone.
Apache 1.3 + mod_lisp + TBNL was always faster.
Really? That's very interesting. What lisp implementation are you using? I use Lispworks, and in my tests (on OS X and linux, I don't have a license for windows), Apache+mod_lisp+TBNL was second and TBNL standalone the fastest by just a bit better than a factor of *two*
CMUCL 19a on a Pentium III 650 MHz (2 CPUs), 512 MiB RAM. Linux 2.6.x (Gentoo)
Tested with CL-WIKI serving a little 30 KiB file.
ab -n 100 -c 5 ...
(localhost)
Regards, Stefan