Edi Weitz wrote:
Before I do that, I'd need some info about current usage patterns. My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations
SBCL
I use SBCL rather exclusively.
usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right?
I usually test and deploy behind mod_lisp2 / apache2 - this works well (after updating kmrcl to play nicely with SBCL) though this introduces a rather opaque layer into the debugging process when things just don't quite work correctly.
Does anybody still use TBNL with Araneida?
Not me.
Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?
I would be very likely to use this as a solution to a number of projects where taking Apache out of the setup would greatly simplify things.
After you released Hunchentoot, I took a hard look at the source and have been considering factoring out the non-portable code ever since. I'd be terribly happy if you beat me to it though ;)
Another project on my TBNL agenda that I started part way down was seeing if I could remove some dependencies (primarily kmrcl) without adding a whole lot a code to TBNL.
Do you happen to be sold on the wonders of the Darcs version control system? ;) If you're not strongly tied to whatever VCS you're currently using, a public darcs repository could be a real boon.
Cheers,
-- Travis