[Sorry Edi, you're getting this at least twice. ]
On Aug 29, 2005, at 6:49 PM, Edi Weitz wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for the delay.
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:11:41 +0200, Alceste Scalas alceste.scalas@gmx.net wrote:
first of all, congratulations for TBNL :-)
Thanks... :)
Here's a small macro (with a big ugly name) for TBNL, that allows to bind portions of a request URI to arguments passed to dispatch functions. (see attachment)
The macro is fine and I have in fact used something similar myself in applications I wrote. I'm a bit hesitant to add it to TBNL, though, as I'm not sure if this functionality belongs there. My gut feeling is that macros like yours are one level of abstraction above TBNL and should be in a separate library.
What do others think about this?
Interesting question. This macro, likely, and the directory file stuff I posted a few weeks ago are both arguably a little higher level than TBNL. On the other hand, these (certainly the directory serving stuff) are not really useful outside of TBNL. Maybe a contributions directory? If this stuff isn't kept with TBNL I don't know how anyone is going to find it.
Cheers, Bob
Cheers, Edi. _______________________________________________ tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
---- Bob Hutchison -- blogs at http://www.recursive.ca/hutch/ Recursive Design Inc. -- http://www.recursive.ca/ Raconteur -- http://www.raconteur.info/