On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 09:18 -0400, Bob Hutchison wrote:
On Oct 19, 2005, at 7:01 AM, R. Mattes wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 12:35 +0200, Edi Weitz wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:44:03 +0200, "R. Mattes" <rm@seid- online.de> wrote:
Ever thought of making backend-specific meta-packages (a.k. tbnl-araneida)? These could just create the correct dependencies.
Hmm. Sounds like work... :)
Remove the test for the :araneida feature and then:
(in-package #:cl-user)
(defpackage #:tbnl-system (:use #:asdf #:cl))
(in-package #:tbnl-system)
(defsystem tbnl-araneida :depends-on (#:araneida #:tbnl) :components ((:file "araneida")))
Does this avoid the undefined order of dependencies problem/feature that ASDF has?
Well, if done this way araneida.lisp in tbnl doesn't need the #+:araneida feature test any more (since it's only loaded for tbnl-araneida users).
Cheers, RalfD
Cheers, Bob
Cheers, RalfD
Bob Hutchison -- blogs at http://www.recursive.ca/hutch/ Recursive Design Inc. -- http://www.recursive.ca/ Raconteur -- http://www.raconteur.info/