17 Nov
2006
17 Nov
'06
12:10 p.m.
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:35:17 +0100, "Marijn Haverbeke" marijnh@gmail.com wrote:
The least-intrusive form I can think of now is to add another configuration special variable, named *handle-error-codes* or something similar (is error code a good term for non-200 responses at all?).
Yeah, "error" probably isn't completely right, but I can live with it.
This one defaults to t, but when it is set to nil then start-output does not interfere with the bodies of non-200 responses.
Sounds OK to me.
If this sounds ok to you I'll implement it tomorrow. What is the preferred way to submit patches to the docs?
diff -u like the rest.
Thanks, Edi.