On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Jeff Cunninghamj.k.cunningham@comcast.net wrote:
Peter Seibel wrote:
I ran into a problem converting some of my code to run with Hunchentoot 1.0. This patch fixes it and -- as far as I can tell after a bit of poking around -- is possibly righteous. What do you think? The basic problem that I ran into is explained in the comment in the patch.
-Peter
diff -r 635083ac9419 hunchentoot/request.lisp --- a/hunchentoot/request.lisp Sun May 31 11:31:25 2009 -0700 +++ b/hunchentoot/request.lisp Mon Jun 01 14:19:19 2009 -0700 @@ -346,7 +346,12 @@ (get-parameters request))
(defmethod post-parameters :before ((request request))
- (maybe-read-post-parameters :request request))
- ;; Force here because if someone calls POST-PARAMETERS they actually
- ;; want them, regardless of why the RAW-POST-DATA has been filled
- ;; in. (For instance, if SEND-HEADERS has been called, filling in
- ;; RAW-POST-DATA, and then subsequent code calls POST-PARAMETERS,
- ;; without the :FORCE flag POST-PARAMETERS would return NIL.)
- (maybe-read-post-parameters :request request :force t))
(defun post-parameters* (&optional (request *request*)) "Returns an alist of the POST parameters associated with the REQUEST
Peter, did you ever get any response to this?
Nope.
-Peter