Re: [hunchentoot-devel] minor modification to HANDLE-STATIC-FILE

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 13:04, Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de wrote:

On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:38:10 +0200, Vsevolod vseloved@gmail.com wrote:

...

Than, maybe add optional parameter to HANDLE-STATIC-FILE?

Yeah, maybe something like that. But in that case I'd use keywords and not optional arguments.

I'm not sure if that's really so useful, though. What do others think?

I think that the content disposition is application specific. I'd not put it into handle-static-file. Applications can always use their own handler function to set up appropriate headers, then call handle-static-file to do the gruntwork.

-Hans