14 Dec
2005
14 Dec
'05
12:07 a.m.
Whoops, I replied off-list by accident. Sorry, Tolstoy. On 12/13/05, Tolstoy <tolstoy@zentrope.com> wrote:
Does the newer TBNL fix this? Doesn't sbcl support bi-valent streams, now?
I've only just begun to experiment with TBNL and SBCL, and I haven't tried serving images with the standalone TBNL yet, so this might be useless. That said, to make TBNL use SBCL's bivalent streams, I did this before compiling TBNL: (pushnew :tbnl-bivalent-streams *features*) If you already did that, then I'm at a loss. Will.