If I understand what you're saying, the openAIR stuff currently works on hunchentoot and there is a desire to see it ported to aserve. Just curious, but what is the motivation for wanting to use aserve? Is it a performance issue? installed base? etc...
thanks,
Cyrus
On Apr 9, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Andy Chambers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Hans Hübner hans@huebner.org wrote:
Are there any features that you are really looking for?
How hard would it be to make sessions work independently of hunchentoot? I'd like (or rather Kenny would like) to make my openAIR stuff work with aserve. Aserve does have webactions but it seems to involve more than just sessions. They have a concept of "managed pages" which doesn't really fit with the way I've done things so far.
I made a half-hearted attempt at just copying sessions.lisp and specials.lisp into my own project but it seemed like if I was actually going to make it work, I'd end up with all the same dependencies as hunch anyway so what would be the point.
I also remember thinking it might be nice to have some of the request accessors be methods instead of functions. Would that be expensive in terms of performance? It would mean I could code my project to hunch's interface and add defmethods to handle aserve requests differently.
-- Andy _______________________________________________ tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel