Perhaps I'm missing something, but why would using *meta-dispatcher* be preferred to, say, just setting the server-dispatch-table? I've been using virtual hosts without *meta-dispatcher* and I'd like to minimize the global changes that would change the behavior of, say, other servers that one might bring up in the same instance.

Thanks,

Cyrus

On Jul 29, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Ram Krishnan wrote:

Perfect. Thanks for the follow up.

Also, thanks Edi for Hunchentoot and all the other excellent Lisp packages you've contributed.

Regards,

-ram

On 7/29/07, Edi Weitz <edi@agharta.de> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:16:57 -0700, "Ram Krishnan" < rkris@kriyative.net> wrote:

> Are there any problems in subverting the *META-DISPATCHER* binding
> this way? Is there a better alternative?

Looks OK to me.  That (virtual host support) was actually one of the
reasons why *META-DISPATCHER* is there.

Cheers,
Edi.
_______________________________________________
tbnl-devel site list
tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel

_______________________________________________
tbnl-devel site list
tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel