Perfect. Thanks for the follow up.<br><br>Also, thanks Edi for Hunchentoot and all the other excellent Lisp packages you&#39;ve contributed.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>-ram<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/29/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Edi Weitz</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:edi@agharta.de">edi@agharta.de</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:16:57 -0700, &quot;Ram Krishnan&quot; &lt;
<a href="mailto:rkris@kriyative.net">rkris@kriyative.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br>&gt; Are there any problems in subverting the *META-DISPATCHER* binding<br>&gt; this way? Is there a better alternative?<br><br>Looks OK to me.&nbsp;&nbsp;That (virtual host support) was actually one of the
<br>reasons why *META-DISPATCHER* is there.<br><br>Cheers,<br>Edi.<br>_______________________________________________<br>tbnl-devel site list<br><a href="mailto:tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net">tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net</a><br>
<a href="http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel">http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>