19 Jul
2004
19 Jul
'04
1:02 p.m.
On 2004-07-19 14:27:51, Edi Weitz wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:54:42 +0200, Stefan Scholl stesch@no-spoon.de wrote:
OK, application/xml and text/xml are a bad choice, because you can't say if it's really a kind of XHTML or just another XML application. You have to parse the content itself for that.
But application/xhtml+xml is OK and recommended.
How about this approach?
Nice. That's perfect.
Heaven knows if the W3C invents new content types for HTML. But I could add "text/plain" for debugging purposes.
Regards, Stefan (aka stesch @ #lisp, FreeNode)