[tbnl-devel] Re: TBNL survey / re-org

Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de writes:

and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right? Does

OpenMCL behind apache 1.3/mod_lisp for development (I love my iBook :) sbcl + apache 2.x/mod_lisp for productive instances.

interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

a plain lispy way - without apache - would be very interesting!

Simply delivering one lisp-image - no need to juggle with apache (1.3 vs 2.X) and mod_lisp... Great! (additionally a replacement for postgres would make dreams come true - waiting for rucksack... :))

Thanks, Edi.

thanks for tbnl - which brought me to Common Lisp :)