Dear Edi,
On 22 August 2010 15:36, Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de wrote:
Faré, thanks for the patch which generally looks very good. However, I just had to revert it because it breaks the LispWorks implementation. I don't expect you to provide the new features for LW as well, but at least on LW the code should still compile and load in its old form - I'm relying on it for my daily work.
Oops, I didn't realize the patch was not lispworks-friendly. I'll see if there's anything obvious I can do to make it compile as before on LispWorks.
Also, I don't see the need for factoring out the version number in a separate file.
Oh, that was an independent change I did to make h'toot more friendly to xcvb (that doesn't read the asd file thus will bork on the version) and the future more declarative asdf 3 (in which asd files would putatively not contain code?). I can separate it from the rest if you wish.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Mail addiction is a malediction.