Edi Weitz wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:40:43 +0000, "lisp" lisp@spikeisland.com wrote:
As an aside, do you know if anyone is looking at whether UCW can be run on top of Hunchentoot?
Don't know. Have you asked on their mailing list?
I remembered seeing this come across their mailing list, actually:
http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/bese-devel/2006-October/002763.html
Jan Rychter on bese-devel wrote:
So, is anyone working on a hunchentoot backend? Seems like a very reasonable idea given the recent explosive development of hunchentoot, its portability enhancements and the overall quality of Edi Weitz's libraries.
I couldn't agree more :)
Marco Baringer on bese-devel:
yes, i've thought of the same thing. i'd like to be able to drop the httpd backend and replace it with hunchentoot, but i want to make sure that it works as well as the httpd on openmcl and sbcl first. in particular i want to make sure hunchentoot, like the httpd, provides the option on not keeping the entire request/response in memory. if it does we lose the ability to handle large files (this, and stream encoding issues, was one of the reasons i wrote the httpd backend in the first place).
Cheers,
-- Travis