Re: [hunchentoot-devel] Request methods suffixed with * -- not backwards compatible?

Hans Hübner wrote:

We found that it was very inconvenient that there are no accessor functions for the slots in the request object, and that the accessors should be conventionally named. I think we are not completely done with the API cleanup, though, and it may well be that there will be further changes before the next real release (i.e. the reply class may be changed, too). It is propably safe to assume that the *-versions of the accessors will stay forever.

Ok. But does it mean that code written for the current release version of hunchentoot will break? As of now, I can't really use our existing code with the dev version, which is quite a dampener..

Chaitanya