I'm guessing that's not being set anywhere... I'm checking Weblocks now.
Thanks for the feedback.
Cheeers,
Yarek
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2008 12:13:29 -0700, "Yarek Kowalik" yarek.kowalik@gmail.com wrote:
CL-USER> (hunchentoot:session-value :remote-addr (first (weblocks:active-sessions))) NIL NIL
Is that OK? I'm getting the same values from both the local host and a remote Windows box -- I was expecting two different IP addresses for each of the sessions I have now (first and second in the active session list).
SESSION-VALUE should return whatever (SETF SESSION-VALUE) put there. So, the question actually is whether someone wrote a session value :REMOTE-ADDR to this session. Did you do that? Did Weblocks do that? What do you get if you inspect the corresponding session objects? (The session object maintains an alist of session values in the SESSION-DATA slot.)
Edi.
tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel