Just noting that I do use ssl and *dispatch-table*, so I would prefer having an easy-ssl-acceptor added to the next release. 

Thanks for all the hard work.

Bryan

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Hans Hübner <hans.huebner@gmail.com> wrote:
I put some work into updating the documentation to reflect how request
processing is done.  The documentation is now a bit more clear about
the base functionality and the functionality that is provided by
HUNCHENTOOT:EASY-ACCEPTOR.  In a nutshell, if you have been using
DEFINE-EASY-HANDLER and/or *DISPATCH-TABLE* in the past, you'll want
to use EASY-ACCEPTOR instead of ACCEPTOR from now on.

Currently, no EASY-SSL-ACCEPTOR class is defined.  If you need it, you
can simply add it ( (defclass easy-ssl-acceptor (easy-acceptor
ssl-acceptor) ()) - If you do, please let me know so I'll add it to
the next release.

I will wait a few more days to collect your input and make corrections
before I release v1.2.1 to include the documentation update and any
hot fixes that might be required.

Thanks!
-Hans

_______________________________________________
tbnl-devel site list
tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel