>> Hi
<br><p><zaries@global.co.za><br>&gt;&gt; I have been using hunchentoot for the last two months and I have created a
<br>&gt;&gt; DB-Grid widget for myself. I pass relevant info in through parameters like
<br>&gt;&gt; table name and columns to display and the widget generates a html grid with
<br>&gt;&gt; paging, edit/delete and search functionality.
<br>
<br>&gt;Hi,
<br>
<br>&gt;I believe that attempt for such standardization could be weblocks
<br>&gt;(based on hunchentoot)...
<br>
<br>&gt;http://weblocks.viridian-project.de/
<br>
<br>&gt;Best regards,
<br>
<br>&gt;Tomek Lipski
<br>
<br></zaries@global.co.za></p>Tomek<br><br>I think weblocks is a bit of
a over kill. I have never used it but from what I saw in the
documentation it is big and in my opinion might carry to much over
head. I am sure it has its right full place but I am not sure this is
it.<br><br>What I was thinking about was free standing widgets that
don't need a whole framework to carry them. A specification for
something like this would include a list of common
properties/functionality and general methodology
(persistence,state...etc) that would fit in with hunchentoot's design
and strong points. <br><br>Regards<br>Phil<br>
      <br>
      <br>
PS. Apologies for re-posting but I am still getting the hang of using
the mailing list....for some reason the previous post lost the text (think it is because my web client wraps replies in table)<br><p><br></p>