Thank you, Hans. I will take a look at that. I wouldn't have thought of that problem. Fortunately, it will be a low-volume site.
--Jeff
Hans Hübner wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 04:33, Jeff Cunningham j.k.cunningham@comcast.net wrote:
I'm looking into setting up a Hunchentoot server on an OpenBSD system and right away noticed problems in the notes about building threads into SBCL (it sounds experimental). Lack of thread support would be a problem, wouldn't it? Has anyone run Hunchentoot on OpenBSD before? If so, were you able to use SBCL? If not, what did you use?
I have not run Lisp on OpenBSD, but here is some advice anyway: Running Hunchentoot in a single threaded Lisp is not generally a problem for low-volume sites. I would decouple the Lisp server from clients using a HTTP proxy so that slow clients can't easily stall the server.
I generally use squid (http://www.squid-cache.org/) for that purpose, but there are a host of other options. When evaluating http proxies last time, I have not been able to find one that supports single threaded backend servers well: In such a configuration, it would generally be preferable to queue requests in the front end process and perform precise scheduling of backend requests. None of the http proxies I looked at (squid, nginix, varnish) supported that.at the time.
tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel