Hi,
I know that there has been a lot of discussion about how nicely TBNL and SBCL play together, and as someone new to this list I wanted to ask a few question about the current situation.
The architecture, I envision has Apache sitting "in-front", passing requests back to TBNL.
In view of http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/2006-October/000710.html and http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/2006-October/000711.html do I understand correctly, that the new road ahead is that TBNL is sort of being "merged" with Hunchentoot to create an enhanced TBNL, that is less dependent on "other" packages and that this new release will reduce the issues related to TBNL/SBCL compatibility?
Many thanks!
Cheers, David
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:47:58 -0400, "David J. Neu" djneu@att.net wrote:
I know that there has been a lot of discussion about how nicely TBNL and SBCL play together, and as someone new to this list I wanted to ask a few question about the current situation.
The architecture, I envision has Apache sitting "in-front", passing requests back to TBNL.
In view of http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/2006-October/000710.html and http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/2006-October/000711.html do I understand correctly, that the new road ahead is that TBNL is sort of being "merged" with Hunchentoot to create an enhanced TBNL, that is less dependent on "other" packages and that this new release will reduce the issues related to TBNL/SBCL compatibility?
Yes.
You can try out the latest beta if you want
http://weitz.de/files/hunchentoot-beta.tar.gz
or you can wait for the 0.4.0 release which I expect to be available in a few days.
Cheers, Edi.
-
David J. Neu -
Edi Weitz