When I try to use it with SLIME on SBCL, it invokes the debugger in *inferior-lisp* instead of SWANK. I tried to figure it out before but couldn't, but what just popped into my head is that this could be due to different bindings for dynamic variables in Hunchentoot threads vs. the SWANK repl thread.
On another note, I don't like the debugging-acceptor code. What was wrong with http://paste.lisp.org/display/81046? That was much more straightforward.
Vladimir
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Vladimir Sedach vsedach@gmail.com wrote:
When I try to use it with SLIME on SBCL, it invokes the debugger in *inferior-lisp* instead of SWANK. I tried to figure it out before but couldn't, but what just popped into my head is that this could be due to different bindings for dynamic variables in Hunchentoot threads vs. the SWANK repl thread.
Can't comment on this one as I haven't used SLIME with the latest Hunchentoot yet.
On another note, I don't like the debugging-acceptor code. What was wrong with http://paste.lisp.org/display/81046? That was much more straightforward.
See the recent discussions about the debugging-acceptor on this list. There will be some changes before there's a release.
Cheers, Edi.
-
Edi Weitz -
Vladimir Sedach