Hi!
Would it be bad style or a bad idea to extend CREATE-REGEX-DISPATCHER (html.lisp) to hold the result of CL-PPCRE:SCAN in variables you then DECLARE as SPECIAL so that the called handler function can access the match information?
Something like *MATCH-START*, *MATCH-END*, *REG-STARTS*, and *REG-ENDS* just visible for the handler.
Regards, Stefan
Hi!
(And thanks for the error handler patch.)
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 19:11:13 +0100, Stefan Scholl stesch@no-spoon.de wrote:
Would it be bad style or a bad idea to extend CREATE-REGEX-DISPATCHER (html.lisp) to hold the result of CL-PPCRE:SCAN in variables you then DECLARE as SPECIAL so that the called handler function can access the match information?
Something like *MATCH-START*, *MATCH-END*, *REG-STARTS*, and *REG-ENDS* just visible for the handler.
I'm not sure if it's bad style but I wouldn't like it. Why would you need it? The handler has access to the URL anyway.
Cheers, Edi.
Hi!
On 2005-03-01 23:32:23, Edi Weitz wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 19:11:13 +0100, Stefan Scholl stesch@no-spoon.de wrote:
Would it be bad style or a bad idea to extend CREATE-REGEX-DISPATCHER (html.lisp) to hold the result of CL-PPCRE:SCAN in variables you then DECLARE as SPECIAL so that the called handler function can access the match information?
Something like *MATCH-START*, *MATCH-END*, *REG-STARTS*, and *REG-ENDS* just visible for the handler.
I'm not sure if it's bad style but I wouldn't like it. Why would you need it? The handler has access to the URL anyway.
It was the first time I used CREATE-REGEX-DISPATCHER and I had to parse the URL in the handler with the same regex. It was just an idea.
But I like CL-PPCRE:SCAN-TO-STRINGS more and it's clearer this way, without the specials.
I've done some projects which used mod_rewrite. Typical rewrite rules matched and parsed a URL giving the registers as parameters to the "real" address. Maybe that's the reason for my first impression using CREATE-REGEX-DISPATCHER.
Regards, Stefan
-
Edi Weitz -
Stefan Scholl