[Cc to mailing list.] Thanks, that makes sense. I've applied your patch to the dev version. Edi. On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Matt Lamari <matt.lamari@gmail.com> wrote:

(Thanks to Martin Simmons of Lispworks for this).

I'm still testing; but in Acceptor.lisp process-connection

At the end - change it so, even if the force-output fails, the stream will still be closed.

(I'm still testing at my end - this took the leaking problem WAY down)

(when *hunchentoot-stream*        ;; as we are at the end of the request here, we ignore all        ;; errors that may occur while flushing and/or closing the        ;; stream.        (ignore-errors*          (force-output *hunchentoot-stream*))        (ignore-errors*          (close *hunchentoot-stream* :abort t)))

Edi Weitz wrote:

...

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Matt Lamari <matt.lamari@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Sorry to pester you privately; but I was wondering if you could verify the leak on your Win32 Lispworks before I approach Lispworks.

I don't know anyone else with a Win32 lispworks.

I'll be out of town for a week and I'm pretty busy right now.  I wouldn't be able to test anything before end of next week.  Maybe you should ask on the LW mailing list if you're unsure?  There are lots of people there using Win32 LW... :)