[Please use the mailing list.]
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:58:28 -0800, Jeffrey Cunningham jeffrey@cunningham.net wrote:
I must be missing something. From the handler, isn't one server object indistinguishable from another?
Huh? If you call START-SERVER, a SERVER object is returned, and you should better keep it anyway as you'll need it for STOP-SERVER. You can use EQ to compare this object with the contents of *SERVER*, can't you?
It can't access, say, the SERVER-PORT to tell which server has called it.
http://weitz.de/hunchentoot/#server-local-port http://weitz.de/hunchentoot/#server-address
On Wed Dec 27, 2006 at 01:13:28PM +0100, Edi Weitz wrote:
[Please use the mailing list.]
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:58:28 -0800, Jeffrey Cunningham jeffrey@cunningham.net wrote:
I must be missing something. From the handler, isn't one server object indistinguishable from another?
Huh? If you call START-SERVER, a SERVER object is returned, and you should better keep it anyway as you'll need it for STOP-SERVER. You can use EQ to compare this object with the contents of *SERVER*, can't you?
It can't access, say, the SERVER-PORT to tell which server has called it.
http://weitz.de/hunchentoot/#server-local-port http://weitz.de/hunchentoot/#server-address
Sorry, Edi. I thought I did send my email to the list. I must have hit 'reply' (most lists I belong to have show the sender as the list).
And I didn't see the SERVER-LOCAL-PORT function.
Thanks.
-Jeff