On 9/5/06, Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de wrote:

SBCL

This is what I use.

and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone.

I use mod_lisp.

Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

I wouldn't.

Thanks, Erik.

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 14:49 +0200, Edi Weitz wrote:

Before I do that, I'd need some info about current usage patterns. My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations

LispWorks SBCL CMUCL OpenMCL

and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right?

SBCL on Debian GNU/Linux, apache2 + mod_lisp2

Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

I'm interested

Thanks.

On 9/5/06, Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de wrote:

Hi!

I'm thinking about re-organizing/purifying the TBNL code-base. It looks pretty messy to me now and I think I could get rid of a couple of things if I find the time.

Before I do that, I'd need some info about current usage patterns. My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations

LispWorks SBCL CMUCL OpenMCL

and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right?

OpenMCL and standalone for dev, CMUCL and mod_lisp for deployment.

Does anybody still use TBNL with Araneida? Does anybody use it with AllegroCL or some other Lisp I haven't listed above? Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

Not really.

Thanks, Edi. _______________________________________________ tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel

Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de writes:

Hi!

I'm thinking about re-organizing/purifying the TBNL code-base. It looks pretty messy to me now and I think I could get rid of a couple of things if I find the time.

Before I do that, I'd need some info about current usage patterns. My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations

LispWorks SBCL CMUCL OpenMCL

and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right? Does anybody still use TBNL with Araneida? Does anybody use it with AllegroCL or some other Lisp I haven't listed above? Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

I use TBNL with SBCL and CMUCL on FreeBSD and Debian with mod_lisp2.

Would sure be interested in Huchentoot for SBCL and CMUCL.

Thanks, Rajappa

Edi Weitz edi@agharta.de writes:

and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right? Does

OpenMCL behind apache 1.3/mod_lisp for development (I love my iBook :) sbcl + apache 2.x/mod_lisp for productive instances.

interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

a plain lispy way - without apache - would be very interesting!

Simply delivering one lisp-image - no need to juggle with apache (1.3 vs 2.X) and mod_lisp... Great! (additionally a replacement for postgres would make dreams come true - waiting for rucksack... :))

Thanks, Edi.

thanks for tbnl - which brought me to Common Lisp :)

On 5 Sep 2006, Edi Weitz spake thusly:

Hi!

I'm thinking about re-organizing/purifying the TBNL code-base. It looks pretty messy to me now and I think I could get rid of a couple of things if I find the time.

Before I do that, I'd need some info about current usage patterns. My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations

LispWorks SBCL CMUCL

I use CMUCL

OpenMCL

and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right? Does anybody still use TBNL with Araneida? Does anybody use it with AllegroCL or some other Lisp I haven't listed above? Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

CMUCL+mod_lisp+TBNL on a GNU/Linux machine.

Is the performance of huchentoot+TBNL better than mod_lisp+TBNL ? Anyway a CL webserver would be interesting.

thanks,

Edi Weitz wrote:

Before I do that, I'd need some info about current usage patterns. My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations

SBCL

I use SBCL rather exclusively.

usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone. Is that right?

I usually test and deploy behind mod_lisp2 / apache2 - this works well (after updating kmrcl to play nicely with SBCL) though this introduces a rather opaque layer into the debugging process when things just don't quite work correctly.

Does anybody still use TBNL with Araneida?

Not me.

Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

I would be very likely to use this as a solution to a number of projects where taking Apache out of the setup would greatly simplify things.

After you released Hunchentoot, I took a hard look at the source and have been considering factoring out the non-portable code ever since. I'd be terribly happy if you beat me to it though ;)

Another project on my TBNL agenda that I started part way down was seeing if I could remove some dependencies (primarily kmrcl) without adding a whole lot a code to TBNL.

Do you happen to be sold on the wonders of the Darcs version control system? ;) If you're not strongly tied to whatever VCS you're currently using, a public darcs repository could be a real boon.

Cheers,

-- Travis