I searched the docs for 'idle' and 'thread' and google didn't turn up anything pertinent... is there any reason to be concerned about the idle thread messages that appear from time to time from hunchentoot? During debugging, they can pop up rather frequently in SLIME, and otherwise they are just logged to the console. Does this have anything to do with *cleanup-interval*?
Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box.
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:27:41 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote:
I searched the docs for 'idle' and 'thread' and google didn't turn up anything pertinent... is there any reason to be concerned about the idle thread messages that appear from time to time from hunchentoot? During debugging, they can pop up rather frequently in SLIME, and otherwise they are just logged to the console. Does this have anything to do with *cleanup-interval*?
What are these "idle thread messages?" How do they look like? Which Lisp are you using? Have you read the messages sent to the mailing list this month? Are your problems related to the timeout problems mentioned there?
Cheers, Edi.
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: : What are these "idle thread messages?" How do they look like? Which : Lisp are you using? Have you read the messages sent to the mailing : list this month? Are your problems related to the timeout problems : mentioned there?
My fault, the answer did happen to be earlier this month, but as an aside, how difficult would it be to set up a search of all mail archives? That would be easier than having to scan each month separately.
Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:56:48 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote:
My fault, the answer did happen to be earlier this month, but as an aside, how difficult would it be to set up a search of all mail archives? That would be easier than having to scan each month separately.
That would be a question for the common-lisp.net maintainers.
FWIW, I find the default search setup to be frustrating too. What we _ought_ to do, of course, is use Montezuma to build our own full text search... but who has the time! sigh.
On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Edi Weitz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:56:48 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD- uk.eu.org> wrote:
My fault, the answer did happen to be earlier this month, but as an aside, how difficult would it be to set up a search of all mail archives? That would be easier than having to scan each month separately.
That would be a question for the common-lisp.net maintainers. _______________________________________________ tbnl-devel site list tbnl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
-- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 885 9127 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM
"GK" == Gary King gwking@metabang.com writes:
GK> FWIW, I find the default search setup to be frustrating GK> too. What we _ought_ to do, of course, is use Montezuma to GK> build our own full text search... but who has the time! GK> sigh.
Here's a quick Google custom search for the hunchentoot/tbnl mailing list:
http://google.com/coop/cse?cx=002927904911724867201%3A0l5rif_cxj0
I have the snippet of code for a search box, if anyone wants it.
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:11:51 +0000, ocorrain@yahoo.com (Tiarnán Ó Corráin) wrote:
Here's a quick Google custom search for the hunchentoot/tbnl mailing list:
http://google.com/coop/cse?cx=002927904911724867201%3A0l5rif_cxj0
Nice, thanks. I've added a link to this site to the Hunchentoot page.
Cheers, Edi.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:06:31PM +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: : On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:56:48 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote: : : > My fault, the answer did happen to be earlier this month, but as an : > aside, how difficult would it be to set up a search of all mail : > archives? That would be easier than having to scan each month : > separately. : : That would be a question for the common-lisp.net maintainers.
In penance for missing a few answers I should have found, I'd be willing to start on a FAQ, if you think it would serve any purpose.
Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:17:33 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote:
In penance for missing a few answers I should have found, I'd be willing to start on a FAQ, if you think it would serve any purpose.
For Hunchentoot? Please go ahead. Once you've come up with something, we can think about where to put it and how to maintain it.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:42:51PM +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: : On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:17:33 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote: : : > In penance for missing a few answers I should have found, I'd be : > willing to start on a FAQ, if you think it would serve any purpose. : : For Hunchentoot? Please go ahead. Once you've come up with : something, we can think about where to put it and how to maintain it.
I'd be happy to do something to 'give back.' I'm not very adept at generating markup, but I'll try to put something together. I'll start with my own questions. :-)
Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box.
On Wed Dec 27, 2006 at 03:48:52PM +0000, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:42:51PM +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: : On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:17:33 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote: : : > In penance for missing a few answers I should have found, I'd be : > willing to start on a FAQ, if you think it would serve any purpose. : : For Hunchentoot? Please go ahead. Once you've come up with : something, we can think about where to put it and how to maintain it.
I'd be happy to do something to 'give back.' I'm not very adept at generating markup, but I'll try to put something together. I'll start with my own questions. :-)
And please include mine. I seem to have a knack for annoying Edi with dumb questions that seemed reasonable at the time.
;-)
-Jeff
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 08:15:24AM -0800, Jeffrey Cunningham wrote: : And please include mine. I seem to have a knack for annoying Edi with : dumb questions that seemed reasonable at the time.
I thought I had a monopoly on that. The wide release of hunchentoot across platforms will certainly try his patience. ;-)
Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box.
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:23:17PM +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: : On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:27:41 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote: : : > I searched the docs for 'idle' and 'thread' and google didn't turn : > up anything pertinent... is there any reason to be concerned about : > the idle thread messages that appear from time to time from : > hunchentoot? During debugging, they can pop up rather frequently in : > SLIME, and otherwise they are just logged to the console. Does this : > have anything to do with *cleanup-interval*? : : What are these "idle thread messages?" How do they look like? Which : Lisp are you using? Have you read the messages sent to the mailing : list this month? Are your problems related to the timeout problems : mentioned there?
IIRC, this is just a minor issue that could be easily fixed, ignoring these non-errors. It would be very helpful for debugging if these messages didn't land me in the debugger every minute or so. Is this something I can track down myself?
Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:02:34 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote:
IIRC, this is just a minor issue that could be easily fixed, ignoring these non-errors. It would be very helpful for debugging if these messages didn't land me in the debugger every minute or so. Is this something I can track down myself?
Sure...
get-request-data is wrapped in ignore-errors, but when it calls chunga:read-line, the timeout occurs. read-line* gets the timeout while calling flexi-streams, which of course calls lower level stuff. I'm over my head at that point. I don't understand why ignore-errors doesn't ignore the error - sb-sys:io-timeout.
Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box.
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:51:41 +0000, Jonathon McKitrick jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote:
get-request-data is wrapped in ignore-errors, but when it calls chunga:read-line, the timeout occurs. read-line* gets the timeout while calling flexi-streams, which of course calls lower level stuff. I'm over my head at that point. I don't understand why ignore-errors doesn't ignore the error - sb-sys:io-timeout.
Look at the definition of IGNORE-ERROS in util.lisp.
-
Edi Weitz -
Gary King -
Jeffrey Cunningham -
Jonathon McKitrick -
ocorrain＠yahoo.com