7 Mar
2010
7 Mar
'10
8:25 a.m.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 08:20, Elliott Slaughter elliottslaughter@gmail.com wrote:
Wait -- what about the following?
- (usocket::get-hosts-by-name (usocket::get-host-name))
(#(192 168 1 100) #(5 223 109 11) #(192 168 56 1)) I know these functions aren't exported from usocket, but is there any reason why they couldn't be?
Is USOCKET::GET-HOSTS-BY-NAME implemented by all backends?
See my previous post about the lack of robustness of hostname based solutions.
-Hans