26 Mar
2011
26 Mar
'11
7:11 p.m.
Hi Edi,
2011/3/26 Edi Weitz edi@weitz.de:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Александр Литвинов lan@academsoft.ru wrote:
There was the same decision at Dec 2007. Now, three years later, you have not changed it.
Well, I don't think it's too bad not to change your mind every year... :)
Actually, I had hoped that there had been some development in usocket since.
Well, there has been some development in usocket in the direction of supporting timeouts. On platforms where timeouts are not supported, an UNSUPPORTED-FEATURE condition is signalled. If that's ignored, everything should just continue without the timeout settings.
If the above is not good enough, could you indicate what more needs to happen to make it so?
Bye,
Erik.