
28 Sep
2010
28 Sep
'10
11:27 a.m.
"Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp@gmail.com> writes:
Hi, Stas Boukarev
You're right. We should always use "ns-try-again-condition" instead of "ns-try-again" as most backends does.
Fixed in trunk and earlier branches.
P.S. Do you know how to reliably trigger this condition? I want to added "ns-try-again-condition" into our always-broken unit test code, so that all supported platforms could have this condition reported correctly. It happened to me when my connection died. I can't think of any software method, aside from writing your own nameserver.
-- With Best Regards, Stas.