Hi!
Support of a proxy in the usocket is meaningful? It will add dependence on cl-base64.
On 6/21/07, Yaroslav Kavenchuk kavenchuk@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Support of a proxy in the usocket is meaningful? It will add dependence on cl-base64.
What kind of proxy are you referring to? SOCKS5? HTTP? (Are there others?)
bye,
Erik.
On 6/21/07, Yaroslav Kavenchuk kavenchuk@gmail.com wrote:
2007/6/21, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
What kind of proxy are you referring to? SOCKS5? HTTP? (Are there others?)
HTTP
Ok. Thanks for the idea, but I think that falls out of the scope of usocket. Also, there's a very good HTTP/1.1 (client) library with a BSD style license: http://weitz.de/drakma/ , so I think it would also be a duplication of effort. It's usocket based and therefor quite portable.
Thanks again for thinking with us. If you have any other ideas, please don't hesitate to submit them.
bye,
Erik.
-
Erik Huelsmann -
Yaroslav Kavenchuk