Hi Jan

Thanks for your suggestion, the feature for :tcp-no-delay will be added soon and easily. I think at least CLISP/SBCL/Allegro/Clozure/LispWorks will be supported first, rest platforms may need some more investigations. The only thing I haven't decided, is to use :TCP-NO-DELAY or just :NO-DELAY for the option name, depend on related exist feature provided by CLISP.

Regards,

Chun Tian (binghe)

Il giorno 13/feb/2013, alle ore 22:35, Jan Moringen jmoringe@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de ha scritto:

Hi,

I like the new socket-option functions and I think methods

   socket-option (stream-usocket (eql :tcp-no-delay))
   (setf socket-option) (t stream-usocket (eql :tcp-no-delay))

should be added.

This addition would enable stream sockets obtained from socket-accept to operate with TCP_NODELAY. As far as I can see, this is currently not possible without unportable code like

   (setf (sb-bsd-sockets::sockopt-tcp-nodelay (usocket::socket s)) t)

What do you think?

Kind regards, Jan

---

usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel