admin October 2003

admin@common-lisp.net

11 participants
20 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Admin] added lisppaste; owned by bmastenbrook
by root 17 Oct '03

17 Oct '03

Add successful at 2003.10.16.21.44.

1 0

Re: [Admin] Hosting request for 'lisppaste'
by Mario S. Mommer 16 Oct '03

16 Oct '03

Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus(a)random-state.net> writes: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:56:42PM -0400, Erik Enge wrote: > > > I'm applying for Brian Mastenbrook (anything to make it easier for our > > customers ;-) for project 'lisppaste'. It's under the BSD license. > > Groovy. I aproved! Fine with me... :-)

1 0

[Admin] Hosting request for 'lisppaste'
by Erik Enge 16 Oct '03

16 Oct '03

I'm applying for Brian Mastenbrook (anything to make it easier for our customers ;-) for project 'lisppaste'. It's under the BSD license. lisppaste is an IRC "bot" that says onto an IRC channel what users paste into a website. I'm sure you've all seen it on #lisp on freenode.net. I've also offered to Brian that we can install araneida + mod_proxy so that the #lisp lisppaste is actually hosted on common-lisp.net. I approve! :-) Erik.

2 1

[Admin] ViewCVS not set up for CLHP
by anthony＠ventimiglia.org 15 Oct '03

15 Oct '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I can't access viewcvs for CLHP: http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?cvsroot=clhp it prints the message : Repository cvsroot clhp not configured in viewcvs.conf Can you fix this? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iQCVAwUBP41gmQqNYTLzAsoIAQIakwP/V8skDlQZPROufhTS3O6bxyuozZeI/54W eVguYIAxelBUspV4P46kxSRkGy2bj60Cp/yanuBN3Pxuish2Oten+zkk8WuAPEUV juSzMZ8lXk8PI2rCZEVtraJx9ZEiZo+jULWRWVkSg5Lhkqp2hIjQ7HzwgO7KelDG x8VWXzsXUts= =4mYu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[Admin] added slime; owned by lgorrie
by root 15 Oct '03

15 Oct '03

Add successful at 2003.10.15.09.26.

1 0

[Admin] New project: Osicat
by Nikodemus Siivola 15 Oct '03

15 Oct '03

I'm applying for project hosting for Osicat: Osicat is a lightweight operating system interface for Common Lisp. It is intended to augment the facilities provided by CL on POSIX-like platforms, but does not try to provide a comprehensive API. Features in 0.1: * Directory iteration and deletion * Environment variables * Symbolic links * File permissions * File kind (regular, directory, pipe, etc.) identification Osicat is under MIT-style licence and relies on UFFI for foreign bindings. The current version is at: http://random-state.net/files/osicat_0.1.tar.gz Cheers, -- Nikodemus

3 5

[Admin] added osicat; owned by nsiivola
by root 15 Oct '03

15 Oct '03

Add successful at 2003.10.15.09.21.

1 0

[Admin] Hosting SLIME
by Luke Gorrie 15 Oct '03

15 Oct '03

Hi guys, Can we please host SLIME at common-lisp.net? Sourceforge hosting has caused us no end of grief, as narrated by Dan at http://ww.telent.net/diary/. I had wanted to get hosting at a big site for reliability (hah!), but that didn't work out so I'd love to move it to a smaller non-bureaucratic site like yours if that's okay. The project bio is: SLIME: the Superior Lisp Interaction Mode for Emacs Prefered project name 'slime'. An Emacs mode for Common Lisp programming with ILISP-like extensions. Communicates with a Lisp process over a socket, and currently supports CMUCL, OpenMCL, and SBCL. Members: Me. Preferred unix name 'luke', else 'lukeg'. Helmut Eller. His sourceforge username is 'ellerh'. [The ones below are on #lisp] James Bielman / jamesjb. Dan Barlow / dan_b. Eric Marsden / M-x. Thanks in advance. _God_ it will feel good to have CVS again. Cheers, Luke

4 3

[Admin] Eclipse application
by Nikodemus Siivola 01 Oct '03

01 Oct '03

I definitely approve of the Eclipse project's application. I feel compelled to point out your choise of license, however. Nothing wrong with GPL, but most Lisp projects prefer MIT/BSD-style for various reasons. For example, simpler interoperability between libraries, or a conscious choise to promote Lisp over other languages, or preferring of free-as-gift over free-as-fsf-defines-it. Is GPL a deliberate and premeditated choise, or have you adopted it "by default"? If the former then everything is ok, but if latter then I urge you to reconsider. But, like I said, I approve regardless. Cheers, -- Nikodemus

3 2

[Admin] added eclipse; owned by ihatchondo
by root 01 Oct '03

01 Oct '03

Add successful at 2003.10.01.09.20.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

admin October 2003