Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus(a)random-state.net> writes:
> Though you forgot to mention the license... ;) Assuming MIT/X/BSD
> style, I approve.
Correct; MIT.
> OTOH I (as usual) would point out that I don't think prefixes are all
> that necessary, but they don't hurt too much either...
I thought some more about that. Here's what I came up with. I think
net-nittin-irc and net-nittin-whatever implement an interface (that is
not defined but still there in terms of the implementation); others are
welcome to implement com-myhouse-irc with the same (or, naturally, a
different) interface.
I've been thinking lately that UFFI is really nice and that USOCKET
would be equally cool. I thought about what I would name it:
net-nittin-usocket kinda implies what I said above but that defeats the
"universal" in USOCKET so for it I would simply choose the name USOCKET.
> Are you interested in expanding this to work with arbitrary packages?
Anything to make the library more general. What did you have in mind?
I know dan-b keeps talking about his hyperdocumentation API.
> If so, then a) I'd like to help, b) wouldn't "hyperdoc" be a better
> name?
a) Welcome!
b) Yeah, probably.
Let's have a quick discussion about what other things it could include
before settling on the name.
Erik.