admin

admin@common-lisp.net

1485 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Re: [admin] Application: Hyperdoc
by Erik Enge 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus(a)random-state.net> writes: > I'm applying hosting for Hyperdoc project. I approve. Erik.

1 0

Re: [admin] net-nittin-hyperspec
by Erik Enge 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus(a)random-state.net> writes: > I have some other interactive documentation related ideas as well, but > that might be a nice start. So, we're looking at: * (hyperdoc:lookup "myfunction" "mypackage") Or something like that? Then hyperdoc would know how to go into that package, ask for *hyperdoc-info* or whatever and figure out how to compose the return value? What possible return values are there? Just URLs? Then Slime and REPL users can ask hyperdoc and have it as a consistent interface while hyperdoc knows how to get documentation from possible multiple types of systems, including what you mention about *hyperdoc-info*? (Although, perhaps it would be better to provide a function that returned the URL.) Erik.

2 1

Re: [admin] net-nittin-hyperspec -> hyperspec
by Erik Enge 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Mario Mommer <mommer(a)igpm.rwth-aachen.de> writes: > Yes, I think that would be ok. Google returns (not NIL) for hslookup, > but it seems to be no danger. I didn't feel comfortable waiting so I went a head and changed it to hyperspec-lookup. I think that will be ok as I see hyperspec.el etc on my filesystem. Is hyperspec-lookup ok with you? Erik.

3 2

[admin] added hyperspec-lookup; owned by eenge
by root 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Add successful at 2003.11.13.14.09.

1 0

Re: [admin] net-nittin-hyperspec -> hyperspec
by Erik Enge 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Mario Mommer <mommer(a)igpm.rwth-aachen.de> writes: > Erik, the problem is not anyone pissed off, just that there are now > two things called the hyperspec that, although related, are not equal. Ok, very good point. > Besides, beware of the trademark! I think that this new name is > unacceptable. Oj, didn't think of that. What could I call it? hslookup? Erik.

2 1

[admin] net-nittin-hyperspec -> hyperspec
by Erik Enge 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Apparently the name is too long to be a valid Linux groupname so I had to shorten it down. Hopefully this will not have pissed any one off. I'll probably do the same with net-nittin-syslog if it is approved. Erik.

2 1

[admin] added cl-syslog; owned by eenge
by root 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Add successful at 2003.11.13.13.32.

1 0

Re: [admin] Applying for net-nittin-syslog
by Erik Enge 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus(a)random-state.net> writes: > Approved. Are you sure you're not drinking too much coffee these days? > ;) No. :) I don't know what's up. I have even more half-done libraries right here in my ~/dev directory (oracle and Linux-PAM) that I may release soonish if I can finish them. Erik.

1 0

[admin] added hyperspec; owned by eenge
by root 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Add successful at 2003.11.13.11.19.

1 0

Re: [admin] Applying for net-nittin-syslog
by Erik Enge 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

Mario Mommer <mommer(a)igpm.rwth-aachen.de> writes: > Sounds great (aproved). Can you just do that (rip log.lisp out and > republish it)? As long as the license permits it, sure. I guess, looking a bit closer, the ODCL license is more like BSD. But no big difference. Erik.

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

admin