Certainly! I feel strongly about that too as any code that I write will be under the GPL.
...which will be more actually, the CD originally started out for use in the Robocup Simulation League and is quickly moving down the path to be used in both our MuSIG and our Robo Trader groups.
Personally, I'd like to see it used as a CL web-development platform! Hey, we control the environment 100% and can easly run a webserver+db+UncommonSQL.
...then there are the aspects of predictivly teaching lisp... it just never ends. :-)
- Heow
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 11:40, Erik Enge wrote:
On Jan 29, 2004, at 11:08 PM, Heow Eide-Goodman wrote:
Everyone brought up a good point regarding the legalities of the distribution, I'll actually refer this to my legal guy but I don't see this as a problem.
Great, I guess we'll wait for final confirmation from your legal guy but as you describe the situation later in your email I'm now pretty much in agreement with you.
So, on to practical matters (assuming the legalities work themselves out): I suggest setting up a proper project for your CD. What would you like it to be named?
Note on licensing: I still feel that the code available on common-lisp.net needs to have a so-called "free" license (I prefer MIT but BSD, LLGPL etc. are ok too) so I'd like it if you didn't commit any code in your project's CVS tree that wasn't under such a license. Does that sound ok?
Erik.