7 Jun
2008
7 Jun
'08
6:33 p.m.
Luis Oliveira luismbo@gmail.com writes:
"Attila Lendvai" attila.lendvai@gmail.com writes:
my docstring for switch would look like this: "Similar to CL:CASE but compares using a user supplied :test function." (if i was forced to write one for a 10-liner, that is... :)
Also, unlike CASE, it evaluates the test clauses.
Uh, I didn't know that. I thought it would expand into something more efficient than COND.
This means that you can't have a clause with multiple keys, right? Then I feel the lack of a fall-through facility.
-T.