On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Mark Evenson evenson@panix.com wrote:
On 1/3/17 20:46, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Mark Evenson evenson@panix.com wrote:
On 1/3/17 00:35, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
Well, I've gone and made an attempt at a "less leaky" version. (It
became
an obsession :( )
Very cool. I need to find some cycles to start working through your
code.
One question: do you expect version of SLIME categorically fail completely with previous ABCL versions (i.e. those without ABCL-INTROSPECT)? Or were your able to special-case the new features in swank-abcl.lisp?
[…]
But is it worth it, given that it will require the new version of ABCL
for
source-location?
I will incur significant "support" cost if SLIME stops working for existing users, so I need to avoid that scenario if at all possible.
I'll look into it.