Dear excellent ABCL developers,
I've filed a bug with *really bad workaround patch* with cl-containers issue tracker- https://github.com/gwkkwg/cl-containers/issues/5
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ruwrote:
18.04.2014, 10:17, "Mark Evenson" evenson@panix.com:
On Apr 18, 2014, at 3:12, Cyrus Harmon ch-lisp@bobobeach.com wrote:
Olof circulated a fix for this earlier today. Can we get this into
the tree?
Certainly: applied as [r14687][], and backported to the [abcl-1.3.1
branch][1.3.1].
Tests finished (svn revision 14688), all good:
http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff21.html http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/abcl/abcl-diff22.html
The only suspicious bug is cl-containers in the second report. But I guess it's not a regressions, the problem happens on the previous ABCL versions too.
I tested it manually on ABCL 1.2.1, 1.3.0 and 1.3.1-rc. When you quickload cl-containers first time, it compiles OK. When you quickload it second time, it fails with the error "no class named ABSTRACT-CONTAINER".
The difference in test results may be caused by different build order of quicklisp libraries when testing on ABCL 1.3.0 and 1.3.1-rc, because some libraries and their dependencies fail on one ABCL but succeed on another.
Best regards,
- Anton
Armedbear-devel mailing list Armedbear-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/armedbear-devel