Hi
Sorry for the general noise, not necessarily related to the issue at hand.
I know I am a P.I.T.A., but I kind of concluded that versions of the kind
YYYYMMDD
Are better than
major.minor.small.itsy.bitsy.bit
What do you think?
All the best
Marco
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 4:16 AM Mark Evenson evenson@panix.com wrote:
I’m a little unsure of whether the “Committee for Ongoing and Perpetual ASDF maintenance” (hi Robert!) wishes us to include the results of “file:bin/bump-version” in submitted patches.
I have a small ABCL-specific patch dealing with UIOP:PARSE-UNIX-NAMESTRING when loading system definitions from zip archives for which I have used bump-version to denote as version “3.3.4.0.1”. I’ve not quite finished my testing to ensure that previous versions of ABCL work well with it, but when I do, do you wish me to include the use of “bump-version” with the patch or is that something the Committee prefers to do on its own?
yours, Mark
-- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before but there is nothing to compare to it now."