![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4ad57009bcdf1ac3818ce190dacffc6b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
15 Mar
2010
15 Mar
'10
11:25 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:
Isn't this a job for
(defmethod output-files asdf:around ((op operation) (c component) ...)
Wrapping around a method that undoes the change that another around method was doing looks definitely like a bad hack to me. Instead, providing an API for a method to advertise that no around method should mess with its output looks like something predictable and which does not lead to double-coding.
Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com