On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
Isn't this a job for
(defmethod output-files asdf:around ((op operation) (c component) ...)
Wrapping around a method that undoes the change that another around method
was doing looks definitely like a bad hack to me. Instead, providing an API for a method to advertise that no around method should mess with its output looks like something predictable and which does not lead to double-coding.
Juanjo